The abstract fetishised space is thrown in to the dichotomy between the unrecognisable and an inability to conceive the recognisable.

The theoretical error is to be content to see a space without conceiving of it, without concentrating discrete perceptions by means of a mental act, without assembling details into a whole 'reality', without apprehending contents in terms of their interrelationships with the containing forms.

"We also forget that there is a total object, namely absolute political space - that strategic space which seeks to impose itself as reality despite the fact that it is an abstraction, albeit one endowed with enormous powers because it is the locus and medium of Power".[7]

The occupiers conscious or subconscious relation with the chair states an intention with a significance that out weighs the relationship with forms of domesticity.