Master of Electronic Art

Representation and Presentation

Introduction | Week: 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9. 10 . 11 . 12 |
 

Future Vision/Neurocinema

 

Overview

Video is the latest step in a process that is destroying the spectacular ritual in art - the going out to the temple to see it - but by no means the last.   The next step is to get rid of the intervening structure, the cameras, the monitors, and telecasting circuity... so that I can transmit to and receive from your mind instantly without the need for the tape or the camera. Douglas Davis 1976   from 010101: Art in Technological Times, p16

 

The Brain is the Screen - Gilles Deleuze

 

The next step in advancing the technology depends on the developments in neuroscience. The MIT and Bell Labs/Lucent Technologies are conducting research aimed at evolving currrent interfaces, to neuro interfaces. The only reason why Neourocinema is not a reality yet is because the hardware/wetware gap has not been overcome. The sentiment to do away with a lot of matter associated with display and presentation of digital art, such as expressed above by Douglas Davies, is encroaching on reality.    Experiments in laser film by Michael Schmid showed that it is possible to project without using other technical means.   Developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI), such as cybernetic communication system that could be inserted behind the eyes and ears , also lean towards descretion. Rene Stettler, a curator, proposed a theory that the nervous systems process and organize information, in a most effective way, and how this knowledge could be applied to the making of machines.   Peter Weibel sees all technology as a man made nature and refers to it as genetic art .   A direct interface between artwork and the brain facilitates interaction and disposes of the viewer as spectator.   As the interface becomes more disceate and the potential of it becoming integrated with our bodies increases, will our subjectivity and our experience of time alter?  

Edward Steichen, Eduardo Kac, Critical Art Ensemble, Adam Ross, George Gessert , Donald Burgy

 

Primary Reading

Sondheim, Alan 1994 Presence of Future Presence of Video: Thing II

 

Christiane Paul   Technologies of the future

P212, Paul C Digital Art

 

Dietrich, Frank The Computer: A Tool for Thought-Experiments

 

More

Shaw, J & Weibel, P 2003 Future Cinema:   The Cinematic Imaginary after Film , The MIT Press, Cambridge/Massachussetts, London/England, ch 00 Screenless

Bainbridge, David Notes on M1 (1969)

phrenicea

Sherman, Tom 1991 Reflecting on the Future of Video

Pisters, Patricia 1998 From Mouse to Mouse - Overcoming Information Enculturation, Vol. 2, No. 1, Fall 1998

Brakhage, Stan The Act of Seeing with one's own Eye

 

Halter, Ed Stan Brakhage. The Metaphysics of Taboo: Brakhage Faces Birth and Death

Picard, Rosalind W 2000 Affective Computing , MIT Press synopsis

Hiltz, Starr Roxanne & Turoff, Murray 1993 The Network Nation. Human Communication via Computer - Revised Edition, MIT Press

(first published in late 70s, on computer mediated communication, projects scenario in 2084) synopsis

Youngs, Amy The Fine Art of Creating Life

Gagnon, Adrianne   Science Finds, Industry Applies, Man Conforms in SFOMA 2001 010101: Art in Technological Times, Hemlock Printers, Canada, p125-127

Rieser, Martin Locative Media and Spatial Narrative

Davis, Erik Anchors Aweigh!

Baudrillard 1983 Simulations Semiotexte, NY

Dantec, Maurice G 2005 Babylon Babies , The MIT Press synopsis

Duguid, Paul   Material Matters:   The Past and Futurology of the Book ' in Nunberg, Geoffrey 1996 The Future of the Book , University of California Press

insect Eye Inspires Future Vision

 

 

 

| Course co-ordinator : Dr Paul Thomas |

| C u r t i n . D e p t . o f . A r t | C u r t i n . U n i v e r s i t y . o f . T e c h n o l o g y |
| D e s i g n e d . Amanda Alderson & . M a i n t a i n e d . b y : Dr Paul Thomas |
C o p y r i g h t D i s c l a i m e r
CRICOS provider code 00301J